I have tried two desktop search application: Google Desktop and Copernic Desktop Search. I have been using Google Desktop for months because it is the first player in the ground. But later, I decide to give Copernic a try. The reason behind this is an article I read which compares desktop search applications. The author gave Google Desktop only a C+ (the second worst) but he gave Copernic an A (the best). This made me curious about Copernic.
Copernic is indeed cool. Google Desktop cannot index PDF files, but Copernic can. In fact, Copernic supports several more file types than Google Desktop. I think this is the main advantage Copernic has over Google Desktop. The searching process is also fast: while we are typing our search query, the results will be displayed on-the-fly. If we click an item at the result pane, a quick preview will appear below the result pane with the queried words being highlighted. Unfornately, in my case, the indexing process took so much time (several days). Well, that is understandable because it indexes so many file types and it run in my home computer in which I store gigabytes of e-books. But it’s quite frustrating for me to see one big e-book (with 900+ pages) can take more than ten hours to index.
Now I will describe about Google Desktop. Google Desktop runs inside a browser, unlike Copernic which is a standalone Windows application. The look and feel of Google Desktop is very similar to the online version of Google, so everybody can directly use it. If you are connected to the Internet, the result will be mixed with the result of Google’s online search. It can index e-mails, Office documents, HTML files, text files, and chat transcripts, all of which can also be indexed by Copernic. In my case, the indexing process is fast: my computer can be completely indexed in two to three hours. But of course, one reason for it is because it doesn’t index PDF files like Copernic does.
Well, so which one get my preference ? Despite the fact that Copernic got an A and Google Desktop got only a C+, I personally prefer Google Desktop over Copernic. Why ? One reason is its faster indexing process. It’s frustrating for me to wait days for Copernic indexing process to finish. Even more frustrating is seeing one file could take so much time to index. Of course, different people may have different opinion about it.
Nevertheless, the main reason I prefer Google Desktop over Copernic is the way it displays results. Copernic only displays the file names and I must click those file names one by one to see the preview and to find the document I’m looking for. In the contrary, Google Desktop directly gives us the preview of each files it finds, just like the online version of Google does. This way, I can quickly figure out the document I’m looking for without having to go through each documents manually.
So, that’s the result of my observation. Google Desktop is still the one who sits in my computer for daily use. Who knows, someday it will be able to index PDF files too …